• CrimeConUK: September 2021
No Result
View All Result
Crime Traveller
  
  • Home
  • Research

    Kathleen Folbigg’s Children Likely Died Of Natural Causes, Not Murder. Here’s The Evidence My Team Found

    Do criminals freely decide to commit offences? How the courts decide

    We might not be able to understand free will with science. Here’s why

    Indian Trafficked Brides: The Stories of Three Women

    Criminal Governance Under Coronavirus: How Colombian Groups Seized the Day

  • Psychology
    Image: Shutterstock

    Psychopaths – Born Or Made?

    The Question of Why: Did Ted Bundy have Dissociative Identity Disorder?

    Teenage psychopathy

    What Should We Do With Teenage Psychopaths?

    A Criminal Disorder? Advances in Neurocriminology Are Leading The Way

    Mark Safarik

    An Interview With Former FBI Profiler Mark Safarik on Violent Offending and Criminal Behavioral Analysis

  • Family Violence

    Reckless Speculation about Jeffrey MacDonald

    O. J. Simpson Trial: 26 Years Later

    O. J. Simpson: Murder in the First Degree

    Reasonable Doubt: The Hendricks Family Murders

    Melanie McGuire

    A Convicted Killer, Two Criminologists, and One Podcast: Direct Appeal Investigates ‘Suitcase Killer’ Melanie McGuire Case

  • True Crime

    Dunblane 25 Years On: How A Mass School Shooting Changed British Gun Laws

    Justice For Helen Book Cover

    Helen’s Law: A Mother’s Long Fight For Justice

    Get Rich or Die Hard! The FBI Manhunt for Houston’s Northside “Sniper” [PART 2]

    Get Rich or Die Hard! The FBI Manhunt for Houston’s Northside “Sniper” [PART 1]

    Court TV Expands UK Footprint with Launch on Freesat

  • Book Reviews

    Details are Unprintable: Wayne Lonergan and the Sensational Café Society Murder

    Operation Jacknap: A True Story of Kidnapping, Extortion, Ransom and Rescue

    Stephanie Scott

    United in Grief: The Murder of Stephanie Scott

    Book Review: Reckless Speculation About Murder

    David Lazar by Robert Kalich: A Book of Truth Merged With Fiction

  • Crime Spotlight
No Result
View All Result
Crime Traveller
  • Home
  • Research

    Kathleen Folbigg’s Children Likely Died Of Natural Causes, Not Murder. Here’s The Evidence My Team Found

    Do criminals freely decide to commit offences? How the courts decide

    We might not be able to understand free will with science. Here’s why

    Indian Trafficked Brides: The Stories of Three Women

    Criminal Governance Under Coronavirus: How Colombian Groups Seized the Day

  • Psychology
    Image: Shutterstock

    Psychopaths – Born Or Made?

    The Question of Why: Did Ted Bundy have Dissociative Identity Disorder?

    Teenage psychopathy

    What Should We Do With Teenage Psychopaths?

    A Criminal Disorder? Advances in Neurocriminology Are Leading The Way

    Mark Safarik

    An Interview With Former FBI Profiler Mark Safarik on Violent Offending and Criminal Behavioral Analysis

  • Family Violence

    Reckless Speculation about Jeffrey MacDonald

    O. J. Simpson Trial: 26 Years Later

    O. J. Simpson: Murder in the First Degree

    Reasonable Doubt: The Hendricks Family Murders

    Melanie McGuire

    A Convicted Killer, Two Criminologists, and One Podcast: Direct Appeal Investigates ‘Suitcase Killer’ Melanie McGuire Case

  • True Crime

    Dunblane 25 Years On: How A Mass School Shooting Changed British Gun Laws

    Justice For Helen Book Cover

    Helen’s Law: A Mother’s Long Fight For Justice

    Get Rich or Die Hard! The FBI Manhunt for Houston’s Northside “Sniper” [PART 2]

    Get Rich or Die Hard! The FBI Manhunt for Houston’s Northside “Sniper” [PART 1]

    Court TV Expands UK Footprint with Launch on Freesat

  • Book Reviews

    Details are Unprintable: Wayne Lonergan and the Sensational Café Society Murder

    Operation Jacknap: A True Story of Kidnapping, Extortion, Ransom and Rescue

    Stephanie Scott

    United in Grief: The Murder of Stephanie Scott

    Book Review: Reckless Speculation About Murder

    David Lazar by Robert Kalich: A Book of Truth Merged With Fiction

  • Crime Spotlight
Crime Traveller

Wrongful Imprisonment In The United Kingdom: When Innocence Is Not Enough

Wrongful imprisonment affects wider society and the more this happens the more we begin to question the efficiency and reliability of our criminal justice system.

by Fiona Guy
20 August, 2015 - Updated on 7 July, 2018
in True Crime & Justice
Reading Time: 8 mins read
A A
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare
The UK has seen its fair share of wrongful convictions. As a result, 23 British Universities have their own Innocence Projects, fighting to clear the name of individuals in prison for crimes they did not commit. The public perception of wrongful imprisonments is that they are rare; a handful of unfortunate cases where the criminal justice system has got it wrong.

High profile cases in the UK such as the Birmingham Six, where six innocent men were sentenced to life in prison in 1965 for a series of bombings which took place in the center of Birmingham, further serve to suggest these are singular events that don’t happen very often. The reality, however, is quite different. It was, in fact, a case of wrongful imprisonment which played a significant role in the push for the abolishment of capital punishment in the UK in 1965. Timothy Evans, a 26-year-old man in London was hanged for the murder of his wife and daughter in 1950.

Three years after his execution it was concluded Timothy Evans was innocent of the crime. The real perpetrator was his housemate at the time, John Christie, who had testified against Evans at his trial.

John Christie had been arrested for a number of recent murders in London and eventually confessed to the murder of Beryl Evans, Timothy Evan’s wife but not his daughter Geraldine Evans, although he was charged with both. Convicted of eight murders in total including the murder of his own wife, Christie was hanged at Pentonville Prison in London on 15 July 1953.

How Wrongful Imprisonment Can Happen

A number of areas have been highlighted as open to risk for wrongful convictions, many of which focus on the procedures in place within criminal trials and the reliance on evidence provided.

Eyewitness Testimony

Eyewitnesses can be a key part of any trial and this is evidence which is based on the memory of individuals who may have been in a high state of fear and anxiety at the time of the event in question.

Human memory and perception can be highly influenced by emotion and an accurate memory of what the eyes saw mixed in with internal perceptions and interpretations of what was being seen is a shady area. Furthermore, an individual could very easily lie about what they saw for a variety of reasons, again bringing such evidence into question. Eyewitness testimony is a dangerous basis for a conviction.

After an increase in cases where eyewitness testimony was called into question and innocent people were being sent to jail, the 1976 Devlin Report was published in the UK with a recommendation that no individual should be convicted based on eyewitness testimony alone. A recommendation that while makes sense has not been made into law.

Furthermore, the Turnbull Guidelines in 1977 were introduced by a judge who recognized the danger of eyewitness evidence for miscarriages of justice. These meant that judges need to advise juries of caution regarding such testimony, however when juries listen to a witness stating they saw the person commit the crime and they are sitting in the courtroom, they are more than likely to believe them, particularly if they appear credible.

Expert and Forensic Evidence

Although provided by experts in the field in question, personal opinion and interpretation, incorrect scientific basis and exaggerated narrative are all possibilities in this kind of evidence. While developments in modern forensic science have gone a long way to help solve crimes and cold cases, within forensic evidence, a common perception is that it is exact and cannot be wrong. However, human error, incorrect science and contamination of evidence can always happen and evidence cannot be taken as absolute in every case.

Police Misconduct

We like to think that the police and law enforcement authorities always act under the laws, however, there are occasions where evidence is lost, moved or hidden or correct procedures are not entirely followed.

Pressure from authorities and the public to solve a case can result in such actions. Some may be genuine mistakes, however, some cases may be conscious attempts to manipulate a case in favor of the desired outcome. There is of course also the strength of a defense counsel to consider. Everybody should be entitled to a fair, impartial and adequately represented trial but, the strength of a defense in a criminal court can only be as good as the defense council presenting it.

Inexperienced lawyers, lack of preparation, lack of time or dedication can all come into play meaning an individual may not get the quality of defense they should and key areas are not adequately addressed which could have gone a long way in proving their innocence.

Changes in UK Legislation to Address Wrongful Convictions

New laws and legislation have been brought in over the last 20 years to try and prevent miscarriages of justice in the UK. Wrongful conviction cases highlighted in the media have prompted the public to question just how safe and reliable our criminal justice system is and the powers that be have also raised concerns.

1983 saw the introduction of The Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) which restricted the amount of time police could question a suspect. All police interviews now have to be tape recorded so there could be no dispute over what was said by who at a later date. A move to try and prevent long interrogations and suspicion down the line with regards to the treatment of a suspect.

A further purpose of this act was to ensure the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and the police handed everything over to the defense before a trial began, trying to ensure full evidence is provided for a fair, open and transparent trial for any suspect. An independent body is now in place tasked with investigating miscarriages of justice in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, with Scotland operating its own version.

The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) are a small group of around 14 individuals including former police officials and lawyers who review cases where doubts have been raised. However, their caseload is sizeable drawing some criticism of how effective they can be.

It does appear that the creation of such a body has provided an avenue for those who feel they are part of a miscarriage of justice in the UK. This provides somewhere to turn where the case in question can be reviewed impartially, thoroughly and independently ensuring the correct process is followed and the correct outcome is reached.

What has become clear with each new wrongful conviction case is that evidence from eyewitnesses and certified expert witnesses is all open to error, misinterpretation and manipulation. Forensic evidence is not immune from this process and while these processes are still relied upon in criminal court cases, mistakes will continue to be made.

Wrongful Imprisonment Cases – When Expert Evidence Is Inaccurate

A number of cases in the UK have involved mothers being convicted of the murder of one or more of their children based on expert evidence stating natural causes could not be the cause of such deaths.

The case of Donna Anthony in 1998 saw her convicted of the murder of her 11-month-old son in Somerset, England due to expert testimony by Sir Roy Meadow. Sir Roy Meadow was a British pediatrician known for his work on Münchhausen by Proxy syndrome, where individuals, usually mothers, bring intentional harm to their children to gain attention. This testimony was discredited and she was released from prison in 2005 after serving seven years. This is a long time served not only for a crime she did not commit but with everyone believing she had murdered her own child.

Sally Clark was another mother who in 1996 was convicted of the murder of her two sons based on the evidence of pathologist Alan Williams and paediatrician Sir Roy Meadow. After being imprisoned for murder, her husband fought to keep custody of their remaining child. A long battle fought courageously by her family and supporters saw both experts being found guilty of misconduct in 2005 and removed from the medical register to prevent them being able to testify in any further trials.

Sally Clark was released from prison in 2003 after serving seven long years in prison. However, this was an ordeal too great for her to overcome and she died from alcohol poisoning in 2006.

Inquisitorial vs Adversarial Systems

While the advantages and disadvantages of the inquisitorial and adversarial legal systems are debated, many feel the system currently used within the UK Criminal Justice System is partly to blame for the number of miscarriages of justice seen in the UK.

  • Adversarial System – the system used in the UK whereby evidence can be presented which is contradictory from expert witnesses and the jury is left to decide which is correct. Essentially a jury is expected to base their verdict on evidence in subject matters they have no prior experience. This leaves the system open to other factors such as credibility of the witness, personal impressions and jury bias – all of which can come into play and influence a verdict.
  • Inquisitorial System – the system used in most courts in Europe where evidence is agreed upon and the facts of a case are clearly established before a trial proceeds. If agreement cannot be made between the prosecution and the defense counsels, then the facts or evidence under dispute is not allowed to be presented to a jury in court. This removes the need for jury members to try and disentangle complex evidence by themselves.

Certainly, the true scale of wrongful imprisonments within the UK has come under question, with many cases of overturned and quashed convictions never reaching the public eye and for one reason or another not being included in the official statistics. While high profile murder cases are often reported in the media, lesser crimes are generally not reported but this does not change the number of innocent people being convicted and sent to prison for crimes they did not commit.

If the wrong person is convicted that means the person who did actually commit the crime is still out walking the streets. The family of a murder victim wants justice for their loved one but they want real justice with the actual perpetrator of the crime being convicted. To convict an innocent person for the crime brings no peace to anyone involved. Wrongful imprisonment, therefore, does not just impact the lives of the person wrongly convicted, but their families and the families of the victim.

American cases of wrongful convictions, when the death penalty can be faced, are a testament to how serious and life-changing miscarriages of justice can be.  The case of Edward Lee Elmore in Carolina, for example, saw an innocent man convicted of murder and spend 31 years in prison, 29 of those years on death row with a change in the law in his favour being the only reason he was not executed.

Related: Edward Lee Elmore – Free After 29 Years on Death Row

In England, the case of Stephen Downing who was convicted of murder in 1973 after he found the body of murder victim Wendy Sewell is another example of the devastating effects of wrongful imprisonment. At 17 years old with a low IQ he confessed under police pressure thinking that is what they wanted to hear and they would then let him go when they found the real killer.

Stephen Downing spent 27 years in prison for this murder, only being released after an investigation by a journalist put pressure on the right people to reopen the case. He was released on bail in 2001 and his conviction was overturned completely in 2012. The murder of Wendy Sewell remains unsolved.

Wrongful imprisonment affects wider society and the more this happens the more we begin to question the efficiency and reliability of our criminal justice system. A loss of faith in the system created to convict the guilty and free the innocent is a worrying concept. When innocence is no longer enough to ensure justice will prevail there is much work to be done in order to correct this balance.

Share73Tweet21Pin8
Previous Post

The Death Of Jeffrey Dahmer: Murder Of A Serial Killer

Next Post

Joanna Dennehy: The Psychology of A Female Serial Killer

Related Posts

Kathleen Folbigg’s Children Likely Died Of Natural Causes, Not Murder. Here’s The Evidence My Team Found

25 March, 2021

Some 90 prominent scientists are calling for convicted child murderer Kathleen Folbigg to be pardoned and released from jail.

Read more

Dunblane 25 Years On: How A Mass School Shooting Changed British Gun Laws

25 March, 2021

March 13, 2021, marked the 25th anniversary of the appalling shooting massacre at a primary school in Dunblane, Scotland.

Read more

Helen’s Law: A Mother’s Long Fight For Justice

21 January, 2021 - Updated on 15 March, 2021
Justice For Helen Book Cover

More than 30 years on from her daughter's murder, Marie McCourt's fight for justice has changed the law. Marie will be at CrimeCon in London...

Read more

Comments 14

  1. Gene says:
    5 years ago

    I also think thus, perfectly written post!

  2. Merle says:
    5 years ago

    I am impressed with this web site, very I am a big fan.

  3. Louise says:
    5 years ago

    I really value your piece of work, Great post.

  4. Tonya says:
    5 years ago

    Thanks for sharing your info. I truly appreciate your efforts and I am
    waiting for your further posts, thank you once again.

  5. Dean says:
    5 years ago

    I am impressed with this web site, really I am a big fan.

  6. Rebecca says:
    5 years ago

    Right here is the perfect webpage for anybody who would like to find out about this topic. You know so much its almost hard to argue with you (not that I really will need to…HaHa). You certainly put a brand new spin on a subject that has been written about for a long time. Great stuff, just excellent!

  7. Karen says:
    5 years ago

    Would love to always get updated great site!

  8. Margene says:
    4 years ago

    I think this site contains some rattling superb information for everyone :D.

  9. Angelia says:
    4 years ago

    Hi there, just wanted to say, I enjoyed this article. It was practical. Keep on posting!

  10. Claire says:
    4 years ago

    Good blog post. I absolutely love this website. Keep writing!

  11. Mikel says:
    4 years ago

    Why do people still make use of and read newspapers when in this technological world the whole thing is accessible on net?

  12. Darin says:
    3 years ago

    Thanks for sharing your info. I really appreciate your efforts and I am waiting for your next write ups, thanks once again!

  13. Latoya says:
    2 years ago

    I love reading a post that will make men and women think. Also, thank you for allowing me to comment!

  14. Ebenezer says:
    2 years ago

    Such an interesting post. I feel horrible and sorry for the man who was hanged and wrongfully imprisoned for the death of his wife and daughter. Even the real perpetrator is the one who testified against him during the trial.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

CrimeConUK

#PsychSore

Stay Connected

Search

No Result
View All Result

Categories

What's New?

True Crime & Justice

Dunblane 25 Years On: How A Mass School Shooting Changed British Gun Laws

25 March, 2021
Justice For Helen Book Cover
True Crime & Justice

Helen’s Law: A Mother’s Long Fight For Justice

21 January, 2021 - Updated on 15 March, 2021
True Crime & Justice

Get Rich or Die Hard! The FBI Manhunt for Houston’s Northside “Sniper” [PART 2]

14 January, 2021 - Updated on 30 January, 2021
Load More

You Might Also Like

True Crime & Justice

Helen’s Law: A Mother’s Long Fight For Justice

21 January, 2021 - Updated on 15 March, 2021
Crime Research

The Rise and Fall of the American Serial Killer

24 February, 2020 - Updated on 9 November, 2020
Book Reviews

I, a Squealer: The Insider’s Account of the Pied Piper of Tucson Murders

26 February, 2018 - Updated on 13 November, 2020
Crime Research

Criminal Governance Under Coronavirus: How Colombian Groups Seized the Day

8 September, 2020 - Updated on 5 November, 2020

RECENT

Kathleen Folbigg’s Children Likely Died Of Natural Causes, Not Murder. Here’s The Evidence My Team Found

25 March, 2021

Dunblane 25 Years On: How A Mass School Shooting Changed British Gun Laws

25 March, 2021

Helen’s Law: A Mother’s Long Fight For Justice

21 January, 2021 - Updated on 15 March, 2021

POPULAR

Helen’s Law: A Mother’s Long Fight For Justice

The Rise and Fall of the American Serial Killer

I, a Squealer: The Insider’s Account of the Pied Piper of Tucson Murders

Criminal Governance Under Coronavirus: How Colombian Groups Seized the Day

Site Links

  • About Crime Traveller
  • Contact Page
  • Crime Spotlight
  • True Crime & Justice
  • CrimeConUK: September 2021
No Result
View All Result
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Disclaimers
  • Cookies
  • DMCA
  • Newsletter

Copyright © 2016 - 2021 Crime Traveller, a website owned and operated by Alythium | All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Crime Research
  • Psychology of Murder
  • Family Violence & Homicide
  • True Crime & Justice
  • Crime Spotlight
  • Book Reviews
  • Get Your True Crime Book Reviewed
  • Become A Guest Contributor
  • Newsletter

Copyright © 2016 - 2021 Crime Traveller, a website owned and operated by Alythium | All Rights Reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.