Thursday, February 2, 2023
  • Crime, The Law & Your Rights
No Result
View All Result
Crime Traveller
 
  • Home
  • Research

    How Your Brainwaves Could Be Used In Criminal Trials

    R. Kelly: Aided By A Network of Complicity Enabling His Crimes

    How Social Media Turns Online Arguments Between Teens Into Real-World Violence

    Kathleen Folbigg’s Children Likely Died Of Natural Causes, Not Murder. Here’s The Evidence My Team Found

    Do criminals freely decide to commit offences? How the courts decide

    We might not be able to understand free will with science. Here’s why

    Trending Tags

    • Neuroscience
    • Mental Health
    • Criminal Brain
    • Juvenile Crime
  • Psychology
    Image: Shutterstock

    Psychopaths – Born Or Made?

    The Question of Why: Did Ted Bundy have Dissociative Identity Disorder?

    Teenage psychopathy

    What Should We Do With Teenage Psychopaths?

    A Criminal Disorder? Advances in Neurocriminology Are Leading The Way

    Mark Safarik

    An Interview With Former FBI Profiler Mark Safarik on Violent Offending and Criminal Behavioral Analysis

    The Criminal Mind: An Interview With Forensic Psychologist and Author Katherine Ramsland

    Trending Tags

    • Narcissism
    • Psychopathy
    • Profiling
    • Mental Health
    • Psychology
  • Family Violence

    Reckless Speculation about Jeffrey MacDonald

    O. J. Simpson Trial: 26 Years Later

    O. J. Simpson: Murder in the First Degree

    Reasonable Doubt: The Hendricks Family Murders

    Melanie McGuire

    A Convicted Killer, Two Criminologists, and One Podcast: Direct Appeal Investigates ‘Suitcase Killer’ Melanie McGuire Case

    Family Annihilation: The Crimes and Psychology of Familicide

    Trending Tags

    • True Crime
      Chandler Halderson and his parents

      Double Murder, Dismemberment, and Lies: The Twisted Web of Chandler Halderson

      Jean Claude Romand: From Fake Doctor to Family Annihilator

      Fate Is Not Kind: The True Crime Case of David Lamson

      Who killed Marilyn Sheppard cover image

      Who Killed Marilyn Sheppard? Ohio’s Most Enduring Murder Mystery [Part Two]

      Who killed Marilyn Sheppard?

      Who Killed Marilyn Sheppard? Ohio’s Most Enduring Murder Mystery [Part One]

      The JFK Assassination … Case Still Closed

      Trending Tags

      • Unsolved
      • Serial Murder
      • Documentaries
      • Guest Posts
    • Book Reviews
      Strangled book review cover

      Strangled: A Courageous Fight Against The Darkest Corners of Humanity

      The Girl I Never Knew - Who Killed Melissa Witt?

      The Girl I Never Knew: Melissa Ann Witt Deserves Justice

      Befriending A Serial Killer: An Interview With Mark Austin

      The Husband Poisoner: Lethal Ladies and Dangerously Tasty Recipes

      Details are Unprintable: Wayne Lonergan and the Sensational Café Society Murder

      Operation Jacknap: A True Story of Kidnapping, Extortion, Ransom and Rescue

      Trending Tags

      • Interviews
      • Historical Crime Books
    • Crime Spotlight
      • All
      • Crime, The Law & Your Rights
      Medical Malpractice

      When Does Medical Malpractice Become a Criminal Case?

      Picture: Richard Bell, Upsplash

      Can A Crime Turn Into A Personal Injury Lawsuit?

      Korean Zodiac Killer case

      A Tale of Two Zodiacs

      5 Tell-Tale Signs Of An Abusive Person

      6 Pros And Cons Of Hiring A Private Criminal Lawyer

      There Were Two Killers in 10 Rillington Place: An Interview With Peter Thorley

      • Crime, The Law & Your Rights
    No Result
    View All Result
    Crime Traveller
    • Home
    • Research

      How Your Brainwaves Could Be Used In Criminal Trials

      R. Kelly: Aided By A Network of Complicity Enabling His Crimes

      How Social Media Turns Online Arguments Between Teens Into Real-World Violence

      Kathleen Folbigg’s Children Likely Died Of Natural Causes, Not Murder. Here’s The Evidence My Team Found

      Do criminals freely decide to commit offences? How the courts decide

      We might not be able to understand free will with science. Here’s why

      Trending Tags

      • Neuroscience
      • Mental Health
      • Criminal Brain
      • Juvenile Crime
    • Psychology
      Image: Shutterstock

      Psychopaths – Born Or Made?

      The Question of Why: Did Ted Bundy have Dissociative Identity Disorder?

      Teenage psychopathy

      What Should We Do With Teenage Psychopaths?

      A Criminal Disorder? Advances in Neurocriminology Are Leading The Way

      Mark Safarik

      An Interview With Former FBI Profiler Mark Safarik on Violent Offending and Criminal Behavioral Analysis

      The Criminal Mind: An Interview With Forensic Psychologist and Author Katherine Ramsland

      Trending Tags

      • Narcissism
      • Psychopathy
      • Profiling
      • Mental Health
      • Psychology
    • Family Violence

      Reckless Speculation about Jeffrey MacDonald

      O. J. Simpson Trial: 26 Years Later

      O. J. Simpson: Murder in the First Degree

      Reasonable Doubt: The Hendricks Family Murders

      Melanie McGuire

      A Convicted Killer, Two Criminologists, and One Podcast: Direct Appeal Investigates ‘Suitcase Killer’ Melanie McGuire Case

      Family Annihilation: The Crimes and Psychology of Familicide

      Trending Tags

      • True Crime
        Chandler Halderson and his parents

        Double Murder, Dismemberment, and Lies: The Twisted Web of Chandler Halderson

        Jean Claude Romand: From Fake Doctor to Family Annihilator

        Fate Is Not Kind: The True Crime Case of David Lamson

        Who killed Marilyn Sheppard cover image

        Who Killed Marilyn Sheppard? Ohio’s Most Enduring Murder Mystery [Part Two]

        Who killed Marilyn Sheppard?

        Who Killed Marilyn Sheppard? Ohio’s Most Enduring Murder Mystery [Part One]

        The JFK Assassination … Case Still Closed

        Trending Tags

        • Unsolved
        • Serial Murder
        • Documentaries
        • Guest Posts
      • Book Reviews
        Strangled book review cover

        Strangled: A Courageous Fight Against The Darkest Corners of Humanity

        The Girl I Never Knew - Who Killed Melissa Witt?

        The Girl I Never Knew: Melissa Ann Witt Deserves Justice

        Befriending A Serial Killer: An Interview With Mark Austin

        The Husband Poisoner: Lethal Ladies and Dangerously Tasty Recipes

        Details are Unprintable: Wayne Lonergan and the Sensational Café Society Murder

        Operation Jacknap: A True Story of Kidnapping, Extortion, Ransom and Rescue

        Trending Tags

        • Interviews
        • Historical Crime Books
      • Crime Spotlight
        • All
        • Crime, The Law & Your Rights
        Medical Malpractice

        When Does Medical Malpractice Become a Criminal Case?

        Picture: Richard Bell, Upsplash

        Can A Crime Turn Into A Personal Injury Lawsuit?

        Korean Zodiac Killer case

        A Tale of Two Zodiacs

        5 Tell-Tale Signs Of An Abusive Person

        6 Pros And Cons Of Hiring A Private Criminal Lawyer

        There Were Two Killers in 10 Rillington Place: An Interview With Peter Thorley

        • Crime, The Law & Your Rights
      Crime Traveller
      No Result
      View All Result
      • Home
      • Research
      • Psychology
      • Family Violence
      • True Crime
      • Book Reviews
      • Crime Spotlight

      Home » Family Violence & Homicide » A Convicted Killer, Two Criminologists, and One Podcast: Direct Appeal Investigates ‘Suitcase Killer’ Melanie McGuire Case

      A Convicted Killer, Two Criminologists, and One Podcast: Direct Appeal Investigates ‘Suitcase Killer’ Melanie McGuire Case

      Did Melanie McGuire kill her husband in New Jersey in April 2004? An interview with Criminologist and Direct Appeal co-host Dr. Amy Shlosberg.

      by Fiona Guy
      17 May, 2019
      in Family Violence & Homicide
      Melanie McGuire

      Image Sources: Direct Appeal Podcast and My Central Jersey

      Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare

      Jailed for life in April 2007 for the murder and dismemberment of her husband in New Jersey, Melanie McGuire maintains she is innocent. With numerous appeals being rejected, McGuire has turned to a new outlet to have her case examined and her guilt questioned; the Direct Appeal Podcast.

      Criminology Program Director, Dr. Meghan Sacks and Associate Professor of Criminology, Dr. Amy Shlosberg, both from Fairleigh Dickinson University in New Jersey, have agreed to review the evidence, interview those involved and dig down into the investigation of Bill McGuire’s murder.

      During her trial, the prosecution presented that Melanie McGuire had shot and killed her husband inside their home on the night of 28 April 2004. They said she then dismembered his body and put his remains into three suitcases. Suitcases that were found washed ashore at Virginia Beach near Chesapeake Bay five days later. Labeled the ‘suitcase killer’ by the media, Melanie’s case has been covered on 48 Hours, 20/20 and CourtTV.

      Across 14 podcast episodes, Meghan Sacks and Amy Shlosberg are presenting their investigations, interviews, and discoveries on this case. This includes extensive interviews with Melanie McGuire herself from Edna Mahan Correctional Facility for Women in Clinton, New Jersey. While Sacks and Shlosberg will come to their own conclusions about whether they believe Melanie McGuire is innocent, their investigations aim to explore how her case was handled and the fairness of her trial.

      The first episodes were released on 06 May 2019 and you can listen to Direct Appeal as new episodes are released each week on iTunes and Google Podcasts and at the website directappealpodcast.com. Episode 14 is yet to be recorded with the hosts waiting for any new information that may come forward from the public before they draw their final conclusions. It is a unique way to explore a case and promises to be a fascinating journey in search of the truth.

      Amy Shlosberg has kindly given me some of her valuable time to answer some questions about the case and the podcast.

      Q&A with Amy Shlosberg, Direct Appeal Podcast Co-Host


      Q. Within your role as a criminologist, is this type of case review something you do regularly, reviewing the evidence and coming to your own conclusion from your research on the guilt or innocence of a convicted offender?

      AS – No, I do not typically review cases like this in this manner. In my courses, my students will analyse a case and come to their own conclusions based on the evidence known, however, this is just a class assignment and does not go any further. As a criminologist, I conduct objective research on a variety of topics using both quantitative and qualitative methodologies.

      Q. Investigating this case in a podcast series is an interesting and quite unique approach. How did you feel about it being a podcast and did that idea make the project more or less appealing to you to be involved in?

      AS – I am a huge fan of podcasts, specifically in the true crime/investigative journalism areas. The idea for this podcast happened organically and was not something we sought out to do.

      Q. Melanie McGuire was convicted of murdering her husband in 2007 and 12 years later still maintains she is innocent. Did you already have an opinion on her guilt or innocence before you started this investigation, or did you try and keep an open mind until you had reviewed the evidence for yourself?

      AS – Both Meghan and I have always tried to look at this case in an objective manner and not form a conclusive opinion. We have both been open-minded throughout the investigation, and continue to be.

      Q. It seems that Melanie is taking a big risk in participating in the Direct Appeal podcast. If your investigation doesn’t prove favorable to her, her open discussions and your conclusion could significantly damage her appeals. Does this encourage thoughts that she must really be innocent to take this risk?

      AS – That’s an interesting question and one that we have pondered. Melanie’s lawyer advised her against this project, however here we are. Her participation could be indicative of an innocent woman who is willing to take the chance, or someone who is guilty who feels as though there is nothing to lose.

      Q. Listening to Melanie tell her version of events so far, it strikes me that if she did indeed murder her husband, she is a very calculated woman in being able to discuss events like she is. Is this something you have experienced before and why do you think would she push for this podcast investigation if she is guilty?

      AS – I believe that an innocent person is able to recount details in the manner in which Melanie does. However, there always exists the possibility that Melanie is a sociopath. Sociopaths often show signs of caring, sincerity, and trustworthiness, when in fact, they are manipulative, often lie, lack empathy and have a weak conscience that allows them to act recklessly or aggressively, even when they know their behavior is wrong.

      Bill McGuire’s remains were found in May 2004 in suitcases on Virginia Beach near Chesapeake Bay. Image Source: Chesapeake Bay Bridge by Ben Schumin. Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons.

      Q. This is a particularly brutal murder involving the dismemberment of the victim Bill McGuire. It is interesting from the perspective of a female offender carrying out such a violent act. What is your experience involving women being the perpetrators of such violent crimes?

      AS – When females murder, they often kill someone they know, so that is not unusual.  Neither is the method of using a sedative or a poison but shooting is not the norm and neither is dismemberment for a female. That is rare and certainly brings an extra layer of scrutiny to this crime.

      Q. These early episodes have focused on Melanie and Bill’s relationship and have highlighted it was fairly rocky from the beginning. There have also been indications of alleged controlling issues from Bill towards Melanie and certainly coercion regarding his speeding infraction where she lied in court for him. It was a little confusing what actually happened there, what was your interpretation of that incident?

      AS – Melanie says that Bill asked her to lie for him in court and say she was a driver because he feared losing his license. He had a lot of speeding infractions. Melanie agreed so that was her choice but it did not seem like something she really was comfortable with. She was jeopardizing her future and apparently, some of their roommates agreed because they contacted the police and tipped them off to this plan. Bill and Melanie were both facing perjury charges and Melanie took a deal that she thought would save her for sure and save him from jail time. Bill was very angry, feeling betrayed by her actions and Melanie says she felt very guilty for a long time but a year later, she realized that Bill should never have put her in this position. Meg’s take on this: without knowing Bill’s version, of course, it is difficult to assess but my feeling is that Melanie was truthful about this incident and that she had no reason to lie about this. She wasn’t the driver of the car and there would be no reason for her to be involved otherwise. She took a deal as advised by her attorney but was afraid to tell Bill. It resulted in some more challenges in an already volatile relationship.

      Q. You teach wrongful conviction classes at the University. Are there aspects of this case that have struck you as being at risk for wrongful conviction? The evidence from my understanding against Melanie is mainly circumstantial with no forensic evidence to put her at the alleged crime scene.

      AS – Yes, the lack of scientific evidence was an initial red flag. However, there are many situations in which guilty people are convicted without anything more than circumstantial evidence. Once we started digging, there were several contradictions that arouse and just simply alternative explanations that were never explored. Lastly, the lack of experts presented by the defense was problematic. Several of these issues and more are discussed in episodes 4-13.

      Q. We have to wait for further episodes to follow the story onto the next stages, but currently at Episode 3, Melanie has described her actions after she last saw her husband. You mentioned some of these actions are a little odd. How do you feel her behaviors in this period contributed to suspicion eventually being placed on her for foul play?

      AS – I think Melanie did many things that seemed suspicious, especially in the days following Bill’s disappearance. It was these very moves that made her the primary suspect pretty early on. At the same time, I do believe many of Melanie’s explanations are sensible. These will be further explored in later episodes.

      Q. I can’t wait to hear the remaining episodes of Direct Appeal on this case and see how your investigation goes and of course hear your conclusion. When will the next episodes be released?

      AS – Episode #4 will be released this week (week of 5/13) and then one episode per week until we reach episode #13. At that point, we will gather up all the tips we receive and also ask the listeners to submit questions for Melanie. She agreed to answer listener questions (as long as they are respectful and not about her children) and concerns. We will then record the final episode, number 14, where we will share our final conclusions, listener theories and the answers the previously submitted questions.

      Q. Now you have concluded your investigation, is this a process you have enjoyed doing in podcast form and do you think you will undertake a similar project again on another case?

      AS – Yes, it has been incredible (although very time consuming) and we have been discussing the possibility of a season two.


      Thanks Amy for answering my questions and best of luck with the rest of the podcast! Find out more about the case and listen to podcast episodes at the Direct Appeal website.

      Related Posts

      Reckless Speculation about Jeffrey MacDonald

      14 November, 2020

      Jeffrey MacDonald was either a murderer or the victim of a murderous hippie cult and that’s a story that you and I can really sink...

      Read more

      O. J. Simpson Trial: 26 Years Later

      8 June, 2020

      Could today's advanced forensic evidence leave no doubt about the football hero OJ Simpson's guilt? You be the judge.

      Read more

      O. J. Simpson: Murder in the First Degree

      8 June, 2020

      Despite overwhelming evidence of guilt, Simpson was acquitted following the longest and most televised criminal trial in United States legal history.

      Read more
      Load More

      Comments 7

      1. Sammie Helivian says:
        4 years ago

        I’ve been reading about this case for hours, but am unable to find compelling evidence to refute the circumstantial evidence presented by the prosecution. For instance, searches like ‘undetectable poison’ are pretty incriminating, but there’s no proof that MM did them, which means they could have been planted by police or others. Did the defense point this out? Where can I read the defense’s arguments against the circumstantial evidence?

      2. Jan Simmons says:
        4 years ago

        I followed this case from the beginning and never felt Melanie was guilty. I think the trial was a circus, no unlike the Pamela Smart trial in the 90s, and look what happened to her.

        There is just NO WAY you are going to get me to believe that Melanie killed her husband in the apartment and dismembered him (how many people could do something as gross as that) AND not one trace of physical evidence was ever found. NOBODY is that good at cleaning. I think this guy got into trouble with his gambling not to mention his temper which could have ultimately led to his death (not that I think he should have been killed mind you). I don’t believe she is guilty.

      3. Big Pun says:
        3 years ago

        She’s absolutely guilty.

      4. LuAnne Dodge says:
        3 years ago

        A blanket from the fertility clinic (where she was a nurse) was found wrapped around the torso of Bill McGuire. Very impelling evidence, don’t you think?

      5. Cate says:
        3 years ago

        Yes. Luanne. She is guilty. That blanket was all of the evidence I needed.

      6. Steven Gilbert says:
        3 years ago

        To me, the most significant item of evidence was the set of suitcases. It was indicated that Bill went to Virginia Beach to gamble and was killed there. Did the defense really want the jury to believe that the killer, after killing Bill, went to their house at a long distance, just to get these suitcases? Do you really believe that the MOB or Loan Shark knew they had these suitcases? Do you really think that they would not just dump his body somewhere? The big mistake Melanie made was to tell the police that the suitcases were theirs. I watched the trial and cannot agree with those who reject her conviction. Also, I believe that her Step Father was involved, why? If you listen to their phone conversations, you can hear him say that they should say certain things on the phone, What does that tell you?

      7. Diana Strong says:
        2 years ago

        She is guilty. She is a great con artist and liar. Look how many people are still falling for it. I’ve never seen a more psychopathic stare.

      What's New?

      Strangled book review cover
      Book Reviews

      Strangled: A Courageous Fight Against The Darkest Corners of Humanity

      15 December, 2022
      True Crime & Justice

      Jean Claude Romand: From Fake Doctor to Family Annihilator

      25 November, 2022
      True Crime & Justice

      Fate Is Not Kind: The True Crime Case of David Lamson

      11 October, 2022
      Load More

      Stay Connected

      Search

      No Result
      View All Result

      Categories

      You Might Also Like

      True Crime & Justice

      The Mishandled Death Investigation of Christian Hopson

      3 June, 2019
      Book Reviews

      Book Review: Reckless Speculation About Murder

      9 November, 2020
      Psychology of Murder

      A Criminal Disorder? Advances in Neurocriminology Are Leading The Way

      19 August, 2021
      Family Violence & Homicide

      An Innocent Man [Part III]: The Trial of Dr Jeffrey MacDonald – A Critique of the Case

      3 June, 2019

      RECENT

      Chandler Halderson and his parents

      Double Murder, Dismemberment, and Lies: The Twisted Web of Chandler Halderson

      27 January, 2023

      Strangled: A Courageous Fight Against The Darkest Corners of Humanity

      15 December, 2022

      Jean Claude Romand: From Fake Doctor to Family Annihilator

      25 November, 2022

      POPULAR

      The Mishandled Death Investigation of Christian Hopson

      Book Review: Reckless Speculation About Murder

      A Criminal Disorder? Advances in Neurocriminology Are Leading The Way

      An Innocent Man [Part III]: The Trial of Dr Jeffrey MacDonald – A Critique of the Case

      Site Links

      • About Crime Traveller
      • Contact Page
      • True Crime & Justice
      • Crime Research
      • Family Violence & Homicide
      • Psychology of Murder
      No Result
      View All Result
      • Terms
      • Privacy
      • Disclaimers
      • Cookies
      • DMCA
      • Newsletter

      Copyright © 2016 - 2023 Crime Traveller, a website owned and operated by Alythium | All Rights Reserved.

      No Result
      View All Result
      • Home
      • About
      • Contact
      • Crime Research
      • Psychology of Murder
      • Family Violence & Homicide
      • True Crime & Justice
      • Crime Spotlight
      • Book Reviews
      • Request A Book Review
      • Newsletter

      Copyright © 2016 - 2023 Crime Traveller, a website owned and operated by Alythium | All Rights Reserved.

      error: Content is protected !!
      This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.